Co-Governance and the Future of AI Regulation - Harvard Law Review
That is, co-governance seeks to make possible an iterative relationship between the technology and its positive impacts; as the technology develops, so...
Summary
That is, co-governance seeks to make possible an iterative relationship between the technology and its positive impacts; as the technology develops, so, too, may the values it embodies become more deeply entrenched.173 In the context of open-source AI, this means committing to a regulatory framework that allows accessibility and transparency to flourish; the same values that underpin the technology motivate its governance. 6. ^Id.. ^Id.. ^Id.. ^Id.. ^The Open Source AI Definition, supra note 14 (emphasis omitted). ^Id.. ^The Open Source AI Definition, supra note 14. [^](https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/co-governance-and-the-fu
Why it matters
That is, co-governance seeks to make possible an iterative relationship between the technology and its positive impacts; as the technology develops, so, too, may the values it embodies become more deeply entrenched.173 In the context of open-source AI, this means committing to a regulatory framework that allows accessibility and transparency to flourish; the same values that underpin the technology motivate its governance. This signals a shift in what’s commercially viable in AI.
Read the original
The primary source has the full paper, announcement, or reporting:
→ https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/co-governance-and-the-future-of-ai-regulation
Curated by Nizam.Wiki — a daily signal in the AI noise.